A Veil of Flare (04210027)
November 30th, 2007
The Biogon usually handles flare better than this. Perhaps there was a big, greasy fingerprint on it this day. Keep your optics clean.
The Biogon usually handles flare better than this. Perhaps there was a big, greasy fingerprint on it this day. Keep your optics clean.
December 1st, 2007
And keep your lens hood on the lens, not in the drawer, haha…
Matt, if you feel like making yourself a first rate christmas gift, look at this:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost-classifieds/showproduct.php?product=7993
December 2nd, 2007
I should really buy the hood for the Biogon, but flare is so rarely a problem for it, that I haven’t bothered yet.
I looked at the 5400 II when it first came out. At that time the consensus seemed to be that the light source was inferior to the scan dual IV’s for B&W work, which is why I went with the scan dual. When my scan dual gives up the ghost, I think I’ll be replacing it with a a Nikon 9000. That way I can move up to MF if the mood strikes me.
It’s interesting to note that the asking price for that used scanner is $300 more than the same model sold for new; scarcity pricing in effect?
December 2nd, 2007
Yes, apparently this is the best 35mm scanner short of drum scan ever made, but I think your reasoning is fine, it would be refreshing to shoot some mf as well. I see you a perfect fit for a Rolleiflex with a f2.8 Xenotar or Planar, or - why not - for a Fuji GSIII to make some really impressive portraits of your girlfriend :-)
December 2nd, 2007
A friend has recently starting shooting with a Rolleflex. The results have been impressive. Such smooth tonality. It makes the world look practically creamy.